On 16 September 2013 17:21, Thijs Schreijer <th...@thijsschreijer.nl> wrote: > Hisham, > > Attached a rockspec for the date library originally by Jas Latrix. I tried > to contact him, never got a response, so I went ahead and updated his > library for 5.2 support. I had done this work before, just got triggered by > Steve s message (that it went unmaintained) to pick it up, test and release > it. > > My repo is located on GitHub, includes previous releases and all my updates > [1] > > I hope this is fine, otherwise please let me know how to proceed
Well, we don't have a standard procedure for situations like this, but I think this is fine, and if the original maintainer shows up we should be able to resolve this. I uploaded your rockspec -- just had to fix the dependency syntax because "lua == 5.1, 5.2" parses as "lua == 5.1 and lua == 5.2", so I changed it to "lua >= 5.1, <= 5.2". Cheers, -- Hisham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
