On 30 September 2013 18:08, steve donovan <steve.j.dono...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Windows people have been complaining about compilers again, which is > fair enough (it ain't part of the base kit) and increasingly OS X is > in that camp. > > At last we have settled on the mingw standard for Windows, so I think > it's time to go through the common modules, and build/upload binaries > (at least for 32-bit) > > Not sure what the workflow would be, but we could divide this job up > in some way. > > steve d. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Luarocks-developers mailing list > Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
I can provide Windows binary rocks for my own lua_bufflib library, should they be compiled against Lua 5.1 or 5.2 (or both)? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
