On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:11:53PM -0300, Hisham wrote: > On 20 March 2014 11:26, Peter Colberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Before I prepare rockspecs that build autonomously, could you revisit > > the last post in the thread “HDF5 for Lua rockspec”, which asks for > > adding architecture-dependent paths to LUA_PATH? > > I see your use case, it's one I didn't cover originally and now the > assumption of .lua files in $(LIBDIR) and binaries in $(LUADIR) shows > in several places (eg the builtin build mode)... It's a bit hard to > give this a proper fix right now.
Ok, thanks for your feedback! I decided to include pre-compiled FFI C bindings in the git repository that are manually tweaked for architecture independence. That way the Lua plugin for GCC is no longer required for installation. One last question: Do you have pandoc [1] on your build machine? My modules use pandoc to build HTML from text files in Pandoc's Markdown format; it would be nice to ship the built HTML files in the binary rocks. [1] http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/installing.html Regards, Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
