Taco Hoekwater a écrit : > Well, I think Manuel has a valid point. Just to be clear: I wasn't trying to make a point. I didn't think about it enough to have a clear opinion on my own, so I was just asking for yours :-)
But if you think the idea is interesting and want to implement it, great! > When kpathsea is initialized > anyway, which is either when kpse.set_program_name() has been called > by the user in a texlua script or in the --lua ini file, or when > actual typesetting is being done and kpathsea has not explicitly > been disabled via texconfig.kpse_init=false, then I see no reason > *not* to use kpathsea as one of the package loaders. > > Perhaps package.loaders will need redefinition anyway, but I assume > it would be a useful addition to have on by default, especially in > standalone scripts. > Yes, it could be handy indeed. Thanks, Manuel.
