On 5/13/2013 11:19 PM, Stephan Hennig wrote:
Am 29.04.2013 20:12, schrieb Stephan Hennig:
Taco, is this change intentional? It hasn't been announced in the
LuaTeX changelog. Do I have to adapt my code (the change breaks the
spelling package) or will LuaTeX be fixed?
Ping!
Referring to field 'command' instead 'cmd' works. I could test for the
correct node field, but since node.has_field(n, 'cmd') returns true and
node.has_field(n, 'command') returns false with LuaTeX 0.76, one needed
to explicitly test for an error triggered by an assignment to either field.
Do I need to add such an ugly test to my code or may we expect this to
be fixed before TL2013 is released?
'command' is the right key (so the has_field list has to be adapted)
(fyi: around 0.75 node field access h as been cleaned up, normalized and
made faster as well)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
