Hi again,
http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=903 Sorry, no time to get into it now. Best wishes, Taco On 26 May 2014, at 10:53, Joseph Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > With the minimal test > > \def\use#1{#1} > \use{\foo123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890XXXXXXXXXXXXXXY} > > pdfTeX and LuaTeX give > > ! Undefined control sequence. > <argument> \foo > > 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890... > > with the "123" starts at column 16, whereas LuaTeX gives > > <argument> \foo > > 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890XXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > with the "123" starting at column 5. I'm not sure why this is: > deliberate or not. > > Notice that as well as being out in position, LuaTeX truncates with no > "..." so it's not clear that this has happened: again, is this deliberate? > > P.S. Thanks for feedback on other issues. > -- > Joseph Wright >
