On 04/06/2019 14:45, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:37:31 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
To reiterate the question: Is this approach to handling options
something that already exists (so we shouldn't have bothered with the
implementation in the first place)? If not am I right with the
assumption that it would be a good idea to make it available as a
generic package, say `luaoptions`?
I only looked very briefly at the description so perhaps missed a
point. key-val-syntax is certainly used a lot by various packages,
but normally packages are written so that they can be used with more
than one engine, so a key-val-system that requires luatex as engine
is probably useful only for a small number of packages.
Also, you loose any TeX catcode information, which may be important in
some cases.
Joseph
