On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 7:43 AM Herbert Voss <herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > Am 24.02.22 um 23:56 schrieb luigi scarso: > > > > > > hm > > what about context test.tex > > %%% > > %% test.tex > > \starttext > > \dorecurse{950}{\externalfigure[target/buch.pdf][page=\recurselevel]} > > \stoptext > > > > here I have real 0m12.763s for 3 runs (latest luatex with -g0 > > optimization). > > > real 0m4.382s > user 0m3.712s > sys 0m0.555s > > curious ... > Why is luatex with context fast and without slow?? > > Herbert > %%test.ctx.tex \starttext \dorecurse{100}{\externalfigure[t/PDF32000_2008.pdf][page=\recurselevel]} \stoptext $ time context test-ctx.tex &>/dev/null real 0m1.829s user 0m1.738s sys 0m0.089s $ time contextjit test-ctx.tex &>/dev/null real 0m1.672s user 0m1.591s sys 0m0.079s %% test-lualtx.tex \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pdfpages} \begin{document} \includepdf[pages={1-100}]{PDF32000_2008.pdf} \end{document} $ time pdflatex test-lualtx.tex &> /dev/null real 0m0.995s user 0m0.967s sys 0m0.028s $ time lualatex test-lualtx.tex &>/dev/null real 0m51.047s user 0m50.256s sys 0m0.689s Note that all tests are done with -O0 -g -ggdb3 without stripping the binaries (i.e.: zero optimizations and size 2.5x bigger ) and that lualatex uses luahbtex, but I think that ratios should be the same. (I need to check optex, btw) -- luigi