Khaled shows a possible fix here https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/738748/1090
David On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 08:57, Cosy MUTO via luatex <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder this is a bug or a specification change. > Integral symbol (\int) looks strange in certain fonts. > Sample source is as follows: > % ---- > \documentclass[fleqn,a4paper]{article} > \usepackage{fontspec} > \usepackage{unicode-math} > \begin{document} > > \setmainfont{STIX Two Text}\setmathfont{STIX Two Math} > \[ \text{STIX2: } \int \quad \oint \quad \iint \quad \iiint \quad > \iiiint \] > > \setmainfont{NewCM10-Regular}\setmathfont{NewComputerModern Math} > \[ \text{NewCM: } \int \quad \oint \quad \iint \quad \iiint \quad > \iiiint \] > > \setmainfont{Lato}\setmathfont{Lete Sans Math}% > \[ \text{Lete Sans Math: } \int \quad \oint \quad \iint \quad \iiint > \quad \iiiint \] > > \end{document} > % ---- > > I did not check everything, but I think there exist other fonts like > these. > > The integral symbol in STIX2 and NewCM seem to be a composition of > \inttop (U+02320) and \intbottom (U+02321). > > Expected result is consistent look between integral symbols as in > TL2024. > > > -- > ._._. > Cosy MUTO > ..._._ >
