Den ons 18 feb. 2026 21:13luigi scarso <[email protected]> skrev:
> > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 at 01:00, David Carlisle <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> or in plain >> >> \input luaotfload.sty >> >> \font\lm="[latinmodern-math.otf]:mode=base;script=math;language=dflt; at >> 10.0pt]" >> \font\lms="[latinmodern-math.otf]:mode=base;script=math;language=dflt; at >> 7.0pt]" >> \font\lmss="[latinmodern-math.otf]:mode=base;script=math;language=dflt; >> at 5.0pt]" >> >> >> \textfont0=\lm >> \scriptfont0=\lms >> \scriptscriptfont0=\lmss >> >> \textfont1=\lm >> \scriptfont1=\lms >> \scriptscriptfont1=\lmss >> >> \textfont2=\lm >> \scriptfont2=\lms >> \scriptscriptfont2=\lmss >> >> \textfont3=\lm >> \scriptfont3=\lms >> \scriptscriptfont3=\lmss >> >> \Umathchardef\int 1 3 "222B >> >> >> >> $$ >> \int\limits_{hmmmmmm}\int\limits_{hmmmmmm} >> $$ >> \bye >> >> >> > I have just committed Revision: 77944 > the relevant part is > Modified: trunk/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/mlist.c > =================================================================== > --- trunk/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/mlist.c 2026-02-18 > 16:11:12 UTC (rev 77943) > +++ trunk/Build/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/mlist.c 2026-02-18 > 20:01:50 UTC (rev 77944) > @@ -3292,10 +3292,10 @@ > /*tex v is the still empty target */ > height(v) = height(y); > depth(v) = depth(y); > - if (opentype) { > - width(v) -= delta; > - // delta = 0; > - } > + //if (opentype) { > + // width(v) -= delta; > + // // delta = 0; > + //} > /*tex > > Attach the limits to |y| and adjust |height(v)|, |depth(v)| to > > Following Hans, it's almost certainly a partial fix, and needs more > testing. > > (and as per TeX Live 2026 Plan: > 21feb: Code freeze for final build, major bug fixes only.) > Thank you Hans for the quick fix! First of all, sorry to push you into this ic mess of ours again, and sorry that we did not test the changes from March 2025 earlier. Maybe we need a better setup for testing during the year. Since code freeze for TL26 is so soon, we will now speed up the testing. Our big set of regression tests will likely(hopefully) catch any remaining problematic cases. Also, I hope that these changes do not introduce any problems for you with context mkiv. Sorry if they do, since I understand that you are more keen to work on mkxl. Again, thanks for spending time again on luatex, that we are so dependent on. >
