The BSD license is good because it allows corporations to benefit from other people's work without offering them any compensation, and without having to allow third parties to benefit from derived work.
FreeBSD is bad? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Togami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:51 AM Subject: Re: [luau] NEWS: MS-funded think tank propagates open-source lies > Several follow-up articles in rebuttal to this Microsoft funded AdTI study. > > http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/11/1022982836568.html > http://www.roaringpenguin.com/adti2.php3 > http://www.idg.net/ic_874686_1794_9-10000.html > http://osopinion.com/perl/story/18179.html > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Warren Togami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "LUAU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:50 PM > Subject: [luau] NEWS: MS-funded think tank propagates open-source lies > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25656.html > > > > A Washington think tank called the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution has > > released its anticipated study of the dangers of open-source software. > Much > > to our disappointment, the organization's press release, which last week > > promised that the study would explain in gory detail how open-source > > software will foster international terrorism, turns out to have been a > > tissue of headline-pimping lies. > > > _______________________________________________ > LUAU mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau >
