cool...thanks for the info! yeah we gotta go ride!
Thanks, Rodney ----- Original Message ----- From: Randall Oshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:38 AM Subject: RE: [luau] processor opinion > Rod! > > Dude the P4s are fast esp. with PC1066, that's 533FSB. Expensive though. > And not supported by Intel. > Bandwidth for video and stuff. > Get RAID too and stripe ur HDs. > Go to like www.anandtech.com to see benchmarks using apps you plan to > use. > > Don't think 64bit Hammer gonna help if your software is not 64bit (I > could be mistaken??) > > > We gotta go ride! > > Thanks. > Randall > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan George > Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 7:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [luau] processor opinion > > On Sunday 28 July 2002 09:06, you wrote: > > Rodney Kanno wrote: > > > I am going to upgrade my home computer, but I am unsure of what > > > processor to go with, AMD or Pentium 4. The main uses of the > computer > > > would be for 3D modeling/animation, video creation/editing, and the > > > usual desktop apps (office, cd burning/encoding, etc...) Any > > > suggestions/opinions? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rodney > > > > For video encoding, Pentium 4s are actually SLIGHTLY faster than > > Athlons. However, they come at a hefty price tag. > > > > At this point however, I'd wait for the AMD Hammers to come out. The > > developer's samples have been very promising and 64 bit computing > can't > > hurt :) > > > > --MonMotha > > This sledgehammer chip is b-ing but I dont have a MLB to test it on > yet. > Nice of AMD to send me a chip I cannot use. > Its supposed to be the one. > _______________________________________________ > LUAU mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau > > _______________________________________________ > LUAU mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau