I never viewed it that way. But your are absolutely right and I agree to move in that direction. I wrote(hacked together) two hooks, one for lxdm and the other for lxlauncher. So i will move on to packaging. Thanks for the encouragement Jonathan. On May 18, 2011 12:32 AM, "Jonathan Marsden" <jmars...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On 05/17/2011 02:39 PM, matthew byers wrote: > >> Hey folks, what is the supported method of getting apport hooks >> packaged? Is the process to do as brian murray suggest and: "In the >> event that you write a hook for a package that you can not *upload* >> or need help getting sponsored, please report a bug about the >> package missing a hook. Then add the hook as a patch (or a merge >> proposal)..." > >> OR do i just send the hook to say gilir or jmarsden for packaging into >> the appropriate package? Cheers > > You left out another important possibility: open the bug as Brian Murray > suggested, then attach the hook to it, and *then* package the > application to include your new hook, and attach the debdiff to the bug > report. > > This could be a very good way to practice your own packaging skills :) > > Once that is done, you can of course ask gilir (or jmarsden!) to look at > your work, suggest improvements, etc. gilir can do even more and > actually approve your newly improved package, of course :) > > Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp