On 2/5/19 12:08 PM, Fritz Hudnut wrote: > > > On 2/4/19 3:44 PM, Fritz Hudnut wrote: > > ... > > > (snip) > > > > Point is that there are over-lapping layers of complexity in the QA > > that just take "too much" time . . . . > > (snip) > > Hi, > > I would like to point out that this is a very valid point. I remember > when I had much more available time to mess with things (like > lucid and > natty era). I found that the QA/bug reporting system seemed extremely > complicated. > > apport should be specifically tuned to use the QA system, as well as > launchpad. > > -- > Regards > > > @Israel: > > > Thanks for the comment . . . indeed it does seem like some > "streamlining" of the process might help get more participation . . . > possibly AI could run "over-watch" between LP bug reports and QA > testing reports rather than fallible human intelligence???? > > F > Hi Fritz,
I am not sure how much Canonical/Ubuntu uses AI (if at all), though probably Ubuntu is used in some deep learning networks :) The idea of using AI to run QA is a pretty interesting idea though. I wonder if any distros use AI? -- Regards
-- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
