Lets get 1.2 out first :). ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: What JDK level should lucene code be compatible with?
> > From: Andrew C. Oliver > > > > Eric Fixler wrote: > > > > > When adding/fixing code in the main source tree? > > > > We did hold a poll of users on this some months ago and everyone who > > responded said 1.2. > > Yes, but since then I've seen folks mention that they're using Lucene in JDK > 1.1, e.g.: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED] > he.org&msgId=117018 > > > Shall we hold a committer vote? If we > > up our JDK we can use more efficient collections! > > I wouldn't expect big performance improvements. Someone could experiment by > switching things to use, e.g. HashMap instead of Hashtable, and ArrayList > instead of Vector, but all that would really be saved is some unneeded > synchronization, and synchronization overhead is pretty low in JVMs these > days. > > If someone can demonstrate that there is appreciable performance > improvement, that would be a strong reason to remove JDK 1.1 compatibility. > > Doug > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
