Scott
On Dec 4, 2003, at 10:22 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
It is (relatively ) slow because I send very large boolean queries. This mayThe reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw
differ from the general use of Lucene where people search for a few terms
and want to access only the n first documents.
Profiling my apps shows that Term access and creation consumes a lot of
time. There was a discussion about this issue when Dmitry proposed a patch
to limit creation of temporary Term objects. In my case this is even more
obvious because of the size of the queries.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:56 PM Subject: Re: suggestion for a CustomDirectory
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 09:45 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:Here is a use case : - my Lucene application is running under W2K - I have (just) a gigabyte RAM - my index is quite big, let's say 1.7 Gb (with a .tis of 31Mb an a .tii of 479 Kb)
Using RAMDirectory is impossible, FSDirectory works but is quite slow.
I'm curious.... why is FSDirectory slow? And how are you measuring performance?
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]