I can't see any zip file in the email, or is it just me? bye --- KorfuT
--------- Original Message --------- DATE: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:21:56 From: Tim Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Lucene Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: >Erik et al, > >In the attached .zip are the files implementing the functionality I >described. I ended up just putting the classes in the >org.apache.lucene.search package - that makes the constructor problem I >mentioned not an issue. Therefore there's not a bug to post the code >against, so I'm just attaching it here. Let me know if there is something >else I should do. > >For reference, it was the org.apache.lucene.search.TopDocs which was the >problem - I needed to call it from the SortedIndexSearcher I created, but it >can't be called from outside the org.apache.lucene.search package. > >The class to look at is org.apache.lucene.search.SortedIndexSearcher. It >contains some basic informatin about how to use it. > >I call this v0.1 because there are some constraints on the fields used to >sort - they must contain a single term which is an integer value. If what >I've done looks like a good direction to take in the API, though, it would >be possible to make the code able to handle arbitrary term values, with a >little worse performance. > >Tim > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:56 PM >> To: Lucene List >> Subject: Re: making a contribution >> >> >> This is great news! >> >> Please attach your new files to a new Bugzilla issue for Lucene (see >> Jakarta website for details) and either submit a 'cvs diff -u' patch >> file along with the issue or just describe what constructor needed to >> be opened up to public in the issue text. >> >> Where your contribution would ultimately reside is unclear. At the >> very least, it can live in the sandbox if you are ok with making it >> Apache Software License. >> >> Erik >> >> On Jan 5, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Tim Jones wrote: >> >> > >> > I've come up with an implementation for doing arbitrary sorting in >> > lucene - >> > it is an implementation of PriorityQueue that can sort by >> an arbitrary >> > field >> > as well as the computed relevancy. It is quite speedy and >> should be >> > faster >> > than doing a sort in the appplication after getting the >> results back >> > from >> > lucene. >> > >> > I thought I'd make this available to the lucene community - what is >> > the best >> > way to do this? Should it go in "Contributions", or "Sandbox"? >> > >> > The meat of it for version 0.1 is four classes which >> subclass existing >> > lucene classes, and one modification to an existing lucene class to >> > make the >> > constructor public so it can be subclassed. So really what >> it means is >> > adding additional API by "jar -uf lucene.jar ..." >> > >> > Tim > > > ____________________________________________________________ Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
