I'm personally quite weary of applying all of these changes to QueryParser without spending a lot of time analyzing the ramifications. As Doug noted, backwards compatibility is practically a necessity, unless there are benefits to be gained by breaking it.

Erik

On Feb 12, 2004, at 6:00 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:

Lucene peeps, note the fairly active patch contributers and a longer
than usual patch queue, especially patches for the always problematic
QueryParser.
If anyone has time to take a look, apply, and test these
patches....please.

Otis

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25820>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25820

[PATCH] QueryParser not handling queries containing AND and OR
correctly





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-12 22:57
-------
One of the Lucene developers will take care of them.
I noticed there are several of them, which means there will be
problems applying
them.
I am currently very busy, and will not get to this in at least
another week or two.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to