On Nov 24, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 10:54, Erik Hatcher wrote:

I much prefer to see our tests and complete codebase without
deprecation warnings, however it seems to be a good idea to keep our
test cases using both the new and deprecated API's until we do the full
clean-up in 2.0.

I'd agree, but I'm not sure how that is possible without just copying many
testcases and replacing only the deprecated calls.

Sorry, my message was not quite what I meant. I didn't mean to duplicate test cases, but rather leave the test cases calling the deprecated methods for the time being. If it is deemed appropriate to also have a new test case to test the new methods, then even better.


Or maybe we could put together an all-encompassing TestDeprecatedMethods that at least had calls to all the methods we've deprecated, but doesn't necessarily test return values or behavior. Then we could fix all the deprecation warnings in the other test cases and leave this as the one test that at least the method signatures are viable (and we can be reasonably sure that if the method signatures still work that the behavior has not changed, I presume).

        Erik


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to