As I'm very interested in resolving this bug, I would like to resume the discussion about it. Chuck Williams (the original bug reporter) and me both already have provided a patch. Is any of the committers willing to review them? If changes are necessary, or another way of handling this issue turns out to be more appropriate, I would gladly put more work into that area. But I need the support of (at least) one committer, and also IMHO some additional discussion about how to tackle that issue wouldn't hurt, too.
--Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-04 23:49 ------- *** Bug 32053 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]