As I'm very interested in resolving this bug,
I would like to resume the discussion about it.
Chuck Williams (the original bug reporter) and me
both already have provided a patch. Is any of the
committers willing to review them?
If changes are necessary, or another way of handling
this issue turns out to be more appropriate, I would
gladly put more work into that area.
But I need the support of (at least) one committer, and
also IMHO some additional discussion about how to tackle
that issue wouldn't hurt, too.

--Wolf


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-04 23:49 ------- *** Bug 32053 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to