Either one or both would be a great addition. Also, is anyone planning on
adding any lanuage stemmers?
Also, is there or should there be a contrib area where some of this stuff
could be developed?
-david
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cory L
> Hubert
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 4:46 PM
> To: Lucene-Dev
> Subject: [Lucene-dev] Implementing Soundex
>
>
>
> Hey. I'd like to start implementing Soundex into Lucene.
> Correct me if I
> am wrong, but I believe the architectually correct way to do this is by
> extending com.lucene.analysis.Analyzer.
>
> BUT...... I heard there is a better phonetic query algorithm.
> http://www.densis.fee.unicamp.br/~moscato/memetic_home.html. Sound we do
> this instead? Or should stick to standards and just implement the Soundex
> api. Hell, why not do both?
>
> Comments?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lucene-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lucene-dev
_______________________________________________
Lucene-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lucene-dev
