Hi Joe, It is a merge, so it make sense (and life easier) to fix the existing NUnit issues before we move on. Sorry, for not making this clear.
Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > Hi, > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. > > However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing > > known issues with > > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the > transition to > > 2.2 must easier. If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a > > "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does everyone agree? > > When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the > changes from the previous Java version (converted somehow), > or are they totally new conversions with some of the > .Net-isms merged in? If the former, this definitely makes > sense. If the latter, I would think it makes more sense to > skip 2.1 entirely. > > In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. > Keep up the good work. :) > > Joe >
