Why not just update your code base to the latest from SVN? In my case, the only NUnit test still failing is Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms().
-- George > -----Original Message----- > From: DIGY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:10 AM > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Unit Tests > > Hi Michael, > > Can you try the FieldDocSortedHitQueue.patch in LUCENENET-94? > > I think it is a localization problem but don't know the reason yet. > > DIGY > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Garski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Unit Tests > > Thanks DIGY! > > I also figured out that I had to perform a build on the > DemoLib project as well to get the tests to pass. Why are > there three separate Visual Studio solutions for Lucene.Net > rather than having all of the projects in one solution with > inter-project references? Is there some compelling reason I > am not aware of? > > I still see two tests that are failing: > > Search\TestSort\TestNormalizedScores > Search\TestSort\TestRemoteSort > > Both are coming from within the FieldDocSortedHitQueue.LessThan(Object > a, Object b) method. Am I the only one seeing this or are > these the last tests to get to pass for 2.1? I'm stepping > through the tests now to determine why they are failing. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > DIGY wrote: > > Compression (Test and Lucene.Net Projects): > > 1- Add SHARP_ZIP_LIB to Project/Builds/Conditional Compilation > > symbols > > 2- Add a reference to ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib.dll(which > can be found > > with googling) > > > > Remoting: > > Since all tests(TestRemoteSearchable and TestSort) > releated with > > remoting use port 1099, it may the case that the port is used by > > another server-thread. Running tests one after another(not > > alltogether) can be a solution. > > > > These are the changes i can remember. > > > > DIGY > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Garski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:47 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Unit Tests > > > > I have a question on the unit tests... > > > > I've retrieved the latest source from the svn repository and built > > both solutions in VS2005, but the unit tests involving remoting or > > compression fail. > > > > Am I missing a configuration for those to pass? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael > > > > >
