If you don't want to use the "FieldCacheImpl.Cache" class, don't call
"search.Search(... new Sort("field"))" .
Just search and then sort the result by yourself.DIGY. -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Matos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Search with Sort Hi Digy, I so your patches, and if I just comment out the cache, what is the worst thing that I can get? Just only be without cache or the order wouldn't be made at all? Thank you, Bruno Matos Digy wrote: > Yes, there is a MemoryLeakage-bug while searching+sorting in versions 2.1 & > 2.3.1 > and as far as I can reproduce the bug, I prepared two patches > ("WeakHashTable+FieldCacheImpl.rar" for v2.1 and "Paches for v2.3.1.rar" for > v2.3.1 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-106) ). > > Although there are still many complains about this issue, there isn't(or I > don't have) any test case to track it down. > > DIGY. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruno Matos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Search with Sort > > Hello, > > I'm with a problem with memory when I use a Sort. Can anyone help me > with this? > I sow a lot of people posting about this, but I didn't sow any answers. > > Thank you. > > -- Bruno Matos ParadigmaXis - Engenharia e Arquitectura de Software, S.A. Avenida da Boavista, 1043 4100-129 Porto Portugal Tel: (+351) 22 605 48 72 Fax: (+351) 22 605 48 74
