I didn't know "release candidate" has so formal meaning. Let's name it "mature version" for now.
DIGY. -----Original Message----- From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 4:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.3.1 Candidate Hi DIGY, Few more things are needed before the SVN trunk can be promoted to release candidate, those are: 1) All AssemblyInfo.cs in /trunck/C#/src/ should have the same assembly version. 2) /trunck/C#/src/HISTORY.txt file need to reflect what has been fixed, show the build version and that this is a RC (release candidate) (change it to "final" when it becomes a release) After those changes, the community should start using the code off this trunk and if there is no issue for, lets say a month, a vote for release should be called. One of the tests that I have always done before I nominate a build for RC is verify that the index works with Java Lucene; you should take the time and do some basic test on this area too. Have the same index be modified by Java Lucene and then by Lucene.Net. Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Digy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.3.1 Candidate > > Hi All, > > > > All waiting patches to make Nunit tests pass > (+LUCENENET-159) are applied. > > Release candidate for Lucene.Net.2.3.1 is in svn trunk now. > > > > DIGY > > > > From: Doug Sale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 12:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Lucene.Net 2.3.1 Candidate > > > > I believe we have a candidate for the Lucene.Net 2.3.1 > release. It diverges from the SVN HEAD by the list of patches below. > > LUCENENET-135 SupportClass.patch > LUCENENET-143 TestStressIndexing2.patch, FieldsReader.patch > LUCENENET-145 DocumentsWriter.patch > LUCENENET-146 SegmentTermPositionVector. > > patch > LUCENENET-151 MultiPhraseQuery.patch > > LUCENENET-152 SegmentInfos.patch, FSDirectory.patch > > LUCENENET-154 TestIndexWriterLockRelease.patch > LUCENENET-155 SetUp.patch > LUCENENET-157 GetFieldNames.patch > LUCENENET-158 CheckHits.patch > > I have attached a comprehensive patch to simplify things for > those of you who would like to try it out. > > 1) Get the latest from SVN HEAD (currently revision 702987) > 2) Apply Comprehensive.patch from the root directory. > > - Doug > >
