Fixed. Renamed "Payload" to "Payloads". Thanks for being the first to try this out.
-- George -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 7:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed Hi, Src does not compile out of the box: folder Payloads - does not exist, what does exists - folder Payload (without ending s) Please, rename search/payload -> search/payloads Andrei George Aroush wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > If you are watching lucene-net-commits<AT>incubator.apache.org you will > noticed that I just committed Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha". > This is a port of src\Demo\* and src\Lucene.Net\*. I was hoping to also > include src\Test\* but it's not ready yet (I got tied up with family > commitment over this weekend to wrap it up). However, it's very close and I > expect to deliver it by next weekend. > > > > Before my delivery of 2.9.0 code base, I tagged 2.4.0, and updated few files > in it. I also generated MSDN style documentation for it. You can find it > in tags\Lucene.Net_2_4_0\* > > > > As for 2.9.0, indexing and searching works but not necessarily bug free, so > feel free to give it a shot and report back with issues and fixes via JIRA. > As in the past, I flagged port issues with {{Aroush-2.9}} (as well as > Debug.Fail() to catch run-time port issues). The majority of those port > issues are either none-issues, or minor. However, for now, I like to leave > them in for sanity check until when I get the test code ported. > > > > Also, if you are following Apache Java Lucene, you will notice that there is > a major issue with 2.9.0 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974) > This prompted the need to release of 2.9.1 which may happen next week or so. > This means, once 2.9.1 is release, we have to adopt it too -- the port of > 2.9.1 should be minor and I'm thinking to role it up into 2.9.0. E.g.: > switch over to 2.9.1 rather than release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 followed > with Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.1. > > > > Finally, any further communication about port progress, I will confine them > to lucene-net-dev@ mailing list only and I ask that we all do the same > moving forward. This way, we don't pollute the mailing list (I always used > both mailing list because we were a small community, but we are past that > now). > > > > That's it for now. So take 2.9.0 for a spin, and report back! > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- George > > >
