[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793796#action_12793796
]
Digy edited comment on LUCENENET-326 at 12/22/09 9:38 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------
There is another small issue related with this bug.
Methods like *FieldCacheImpl.GetStringIndex* , *FieldCacheImpl.GetStrings* etc.
get ??"Object reference not set to an instance of an object"?? exception when
*TestSort.TestParallelMultiSort* is executed with 10-20 threads in parallel.
Making *FieldCacheImpl.Init* atomic solves the problem.
I committed the patch.
DIGY
was (Author: digydigy):
There is another small issue related with this bug.
Methods like *FieldCacheImpl.GetStringIndex* , *FieldCacheImpl.GetStrings* etc.
get ??"Object reference not set to an instance of an object"?? exception when
*TestSort.TestParallelMultiSort* are executed with 10-20 threads in parallel.
Making *FieldCacheImpl.Init* atomic solves the problem.
I committed the patch.
DIGY
> Bug in TestSort.TestParallelMultiSort
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-326
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-326
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Digy
> Assignee: Digy
> Attachments: SupportClass.patch, TestSort.TestParallelMultiSort.JPG,
> TestSupportClass.patch
>
>
> I see this bug for the first time. Attached image is a good source for
> debugging.
> DIGY
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
