I didn't know this! My understanding is, voting in new committers to a project is the task of the committers of that project, no?
We have all the committers' vote in now, should I re-open this vote at priv...@l.a.o? -- George -----Original Message----- From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 12:58 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer FYI, this should be sent to the Lucene PMC, priv...@l.a.o. Lucene.NET has graduated. On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Doug Sale wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Doug Sale <dougs...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:19 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer > To: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org > > > [X ] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM, George Aroush <geo...@aroush.net> wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> >> >> I propose Michael Garski as a new Lucene.Net committer. >> >> >> >> Mike has been contributing for Lucene.Net since late 2007 and as of November >> 2009 he consistently contributed for 2.9.1. In addition, he has been >> actively participating in dev and user discussions and providing support. >> He is comfortable with Lucene.Net and knows about porting activities. >> >> >> >> [ ] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net >> >> [ ] NO, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net -- provide reason(s). >> >> >> >> So please cast your votes. >> >> >> >> Voting ends this coming Friday, December the 19, 2009. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> - George Aroush >> >> >> >>
