There is an argument for making a formal release of 2.4.x as the first post-incubator release, since people will want 2.4 support for a long time to come. It allow you to wring release process issues.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > The NIOFSDirectory implementation is buggy + Lucene.Java doesn't recommend > it on Windows. > (http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/api/all/org/apache/lucene/store/NIOFSDi > rectory.html) > > Until we have a good(not just bug-free) implementaion of NIOFSDirectory we > should replace it with a dummy (just throwing not-implemented-exception) one > as in v2.4.1 > > DIGY > > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net] > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:32 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1 > > Hi folks, > > > > Happy New Year! > > > > So what's the status of 2.9.1? Are there any outstanding issues need to be > resolved? Has folks been giving it a try? > > > > We need to close this loose end loop and if there is no outstanding issues, > officially release Lucene.Net 2.9.1 so work can start on 3.0 and beyond. > > > > My suggestion is, we announce it on the lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org > list and then start the packaging process for an official release. If I > hear no objection by 1/9/2010, I will start the process. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George > > >
