[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835308#action_12835308 ]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-340: -------------------------------- +1 for me too. But a new patch is needed for 2.9.2 DIGY > Fieldable.ReaderValue should return TextReader not StreamReader > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENENET-340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340 > Project: Lucene.Net > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Andy Pook > Priority: Minor > Attachments: LUCENENET-340-Fieldable.ReaderValue-r911211.patch, > LUCENENET-340-Filedable.ReaderValue.patch > > > Using the more abstract type makes creating custome Fieldables easier as they > can use other TextReader descendants (such as StringReader). > Internally the main use seems to be from DocInverterPerField (eg line 125) > where it is used via a local member of type TextReader. > The original Java uses the abstract Reader type. Is there a reason why the > dotNet conversion uses StreamReader here while using TextReader elsewhere? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.