If it spins up a VM just for conversion purposes, does performance matter much? It'll just be one of us converting it. If it has less pre / post work to convert correctly to a buildable solution, the extra overhead to convert is probably less painful.
~Prescott Nasser > From: m...@aaron-powell.com > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:25:18 +1100 > Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > What's the performance of IKVM? I'm skeptical about having to spin up a Java > VM inside .NET and the kind of overhead that that would produce > Aaron Powell > Umbraco Ninja > > http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: > aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ryan Hoffman <rhoff...@tntp.org> wrote: > > > Hey Guys, > > > > I'm loving all the recent activity on the dev list. I've been watching it > > for some time, and I was also deeply disturbed seeing no posts. This is my > > first message on the list :). > > > > I see that you are evaluating Sharpen. I was wondering if you've heard of > > IKVM, it's a Java VM that runs on top of .NET/Mono and it also includes a > > tool which can be used to convert java libraries/apps to .NET assemblies. > > Check it out at: http://www.ikvm.net/. If this works, it promises to be > > a very reliable way to convert the official java distribution to .NET. > > > > I will give this a shot soon and report back! > > > > Ryan Hoffman > > Software Architect > > The New Teacher Project > > www.tntp.org > > > > Evaluation systems are broken - so how do we fix them? Teacher Evaluation > > 2.0 - http://tntp.org/eval2.0 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aaron Powell [mailto:m...@aaron-powell.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:25 PM > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen > > > > Nice work Alex with getting the ball rolling. > > > > I've decided to chuck the contents of that ZIP onto bitbucket (I hope you > > don't mind) since it'll be easier to track the testing against it than > > through an email. It's available here: > > http://hg.slace.biz/lucene-via-sharpen > > This is the raw package contents from Alex, I'll do some updates to it so > > that it's not tied to Alex's setup and works more generically (unless > > someone beats me to it) over the weekend > > > > <http://hg.slace.biz/lucene-via-sharpen>Note: This is NOT an attempt to > > move away from ASF, it's just a way for us to test out how well Sharpen > > performs as a tool for Java to .NET conversion, if it turns out to be a > > viable option this will be rolled back to ASF. This is just a playground :) > > > > Aaron Powell > > Umbraco Ninja > > > > http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: > > aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Alex Thompson <pierogi...@hotmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I did an initial run of Lucene 3.0.2 through Sharpen. It stops when there > > > is > > > an error or finds something it doesn't have a mapping for. I added some > > > placeholder mappings so it would at least get through a few files. > > > > > > Here is a package of what I have so far: > > > http://convid.com/alex/lucene/Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip > > > > > > It contains the C# files from the test run, the jars for Sharpen, and my > > > Ant > > > script with the custom mappings. I encourage others to look at the code > > and > > > try sharpen. You can use my script to get started. > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > >
