We had to deal with that in the NH project, it isn't that hard to keep up On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Hans Merkl <h...@hmerkl.com> wrote:
> Keep in mind that Java Lucene is being developed actively. Once you > start to optimize for .NET, it will become harder and harder to keep > up with future Java Lucene development. > > Whats does MPS do that may be useful for Lucene.NET? > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:54, Karell Ste-Marie <stema...@brain-bank.com> > wrote: > > I have done no other past contribution other than use the product, > > > > Can I be reminded, once again, why we don't use the .NET Optimized > > approaches instead of doing a straight code-code port? > > > > I understand that the whole purpose of the project is to be a Lucene > > port to .NET, but should we not at some point in time optimize more for > > .NET than just continue to try and port more Java to .NET code? From > > Scratch? Each and every version? > > > > It seems to be that if that is the approach then perhaps it would be > > time better spent to look into a tool such as MPS > > (http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/) and then use the source java language > > through this which would product .NET code on the other side. > > > > Or perhaps I've just managed to place a size-12 foot in my mouth because > > the current process is actually almost exactly this today? > > > > Comments welcome... > > > > > > > > Karell Ste-Marie > > C.I.O. - BrainBank Inc > > (514) 636-6655 > > >
