They all contain Apache License 1.1 and compatible with v1.4.3( for ex, they
don't implement ReusableTokenStream of Analyzer class)
There may be also other fixes in v2.9. I think they can wait till a complete
review.


DIGY




-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-392) Arabic Analyzer


 
Would it make sense to also commit the analyzers that Prasha converted and
submitted here:
 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372

 
~P


> From: digyd...@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-392) Arabic Analyzer
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:33:37 +0200
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> I don't see it as a "request for permission". It is rather to inform
people
> about the change who may have different ideas and give a chance to comment
> on it if this change breaks something in their own local copy.
> 
> DIGY
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 12:10 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-392) Arabic Analyzer
> 
> On 2011-02-08, Digy (JIRA) wrote:
> 
> > Digy commented on LUCENENET-392:
> > --------------------------------
> 
> > If no objections, I am going to commit it in a few days.
> 
> Generally in a healthy project it is way easier to ask for forgiveness
> than for permission[1]. It is all under version control so things can
> be changed and even removed again easily when anything goes wrong.
> 
> I hope anybody who'd be interested is subscribed to the commits list and
> will see the changes and can comment on them later.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Stefan
> 
> [1] A lesson I had to learn myself
> <http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=86951893306302&w=2>
>                                         =

Reply via email to