Troy, I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
Scott On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] wrote: > > Scott, > > I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up > and create separate JIRA issues for each one. > > Thanks, > Troy > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott > <slomb...@kingindustries.com> wrote: > > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next couple > of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are > we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that > need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task? > > > > Scott > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28 > > > > All, > > > > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of > > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some > > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by > > unnoticed. > > > > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the > > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out > > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team > > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding > > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions > > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts > > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the > > project until the website is updated. > > > > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving > > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could > > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or > > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit > > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me', > > and perhaps not enough 'we'. > > > > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction, > > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in > > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of > > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow > > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of > > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The > > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that > > requires all of us. > > > > > > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete > > by next Monday are: > > > > Troy Howard: > > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2 > > > > Sergey Mirvoda: > > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion > > > > Michael Herndon: > > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server > > > > Prescott Nasser: > > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current > > status and information > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based > > > > Alex Thompson: > > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool > > > > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete > > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change > > assignments? > > > > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any > > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed > > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a > > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the > > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else? > > > > Thanks, > > Troy > > > > > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the > > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may > > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or > > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or > > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, > > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, > > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting > > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc. > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
