Well, the changes are currently only on a branch. Migrating these changes into trunk can be a slower process... or we could decide to go a different way altogether. This is just what made sense while building this release.
That said, change, whenever it comes, does require a certain amount of adjustment for everyone. Hopefully the changes are valuable enough that they justify the costs. Thanks, Troy On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > If this directory structure is to be used also in trunk, I must say that that > I am not comfortable with this rapid changes without any previous > warnings(although I understand Troy's arguments). Now, I have to reorganize > all my local works. > > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 1:06 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Cc: Wyatt Barnett > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-377) Upgrade solution > to VS2010 > > I prefer it that way as well, but the current setup has one for each > project. I guess it makes sense for the Contrib projects because the > folks who developed them probably worked on them in isolation from the > rest of Lucene.Net. > > Anyway, I'd be happy to have less files to maintain. ;) > > If they don't have a solid and obvious purpose, axe them. > > Thanks, > Troy > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> One thing I'm not quite following -- why does one need a solution for >> every single project? Point of solution files is so one can have >> multiple projects linked in realish time, so we probably need a single >> solution for everything or perhaps two covering core lucene and >> contrib. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Prescott Nasser (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999618#comment-12999618 >>> ] >>> >>> Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-377: >>> ------------------------------------------- >>> >>> probably should wipe out the vs2010 branch in all honesty... >>> >>>> Upgrade solution to VS2010 >>>> -------------------------- >>>> >>>> Key: LUCENENET-377 >>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377 >>>> Project: Lucene.Net >>>> Issue Type: Task >>>> Components: Lucene.Net Core >>>> Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 3.x >>>> Reporter: Jeffrey Cameron >>>> Assignee: Prescott Nasser >>>> Labels: solution >>>> Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4 >>>> >>>> Attachments: lucene.zip >>>> >>>> Original Estimate: 10m >>>> Remaining Estimate: 10m >>>> >>>> VS2005 is quite out of date now and there are many new improvements in >>>> VS2010. You can still leave the framework support at .NET 2.0 if you like. >>> >>> -- >>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>> - >>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >>> >>> >>> >> > >
