Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it to
the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at
finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want to hold
off 3.0.3 that much longer
> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> From: zgram...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
> FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against 2.9.4.1,
> which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm the only one.
>
> I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is
> included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect 3.0.3
> to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite a bit of
> work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the .NETification
> changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they now have to
> wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy coders out
> there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand.
>
> It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I would be
> happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help.
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> > getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
> > this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into
> > the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
> > maintenance release shortly after.
>
