Thanks Michael. I have considered doing as you have suggested but I was hoping that i was doing something wrong with the index build and it would be a quick fix. Guess I will be going down that road now.
I don't understand why lucene is slow at sorting when that is one of things that it is supposed to do efficiently. Mark On Jan 10, 2008 12:04 AM, Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also found built-in sorting very slow and ended up with populating > certain C# collection from hits in default order and then sorting that > collection. Apart from greater speed , more possibilities to > implement any kind of sorting. > > On Jan 10, 2008 3:19 PM, Mark Burks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have an index that when i search for term with out sorting the results > are > > returned in .7 seconds or less. When I choose to search with a column > chosen > > for sorting the results will return in 7 - 10 seconds. The larger the # > of > > hits the longer it takes when sorting. The fields that can be sorted on > are > > unique to the document,stored in the index as un_tokenized. I am using > > lucene.net 2.0. Index size is normally around 2.5 gig but i have the > > same problem on a 500 meg index too. Has anyone else experienced this? > > > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark Burks > > >
