Marcelino - 

Give it a try with Lucene 2.4 - there is a tag in the SVN repository for it.  
If it still occurs, a stack trace with line numbers inside of Lucene would be 
helpful.  You may want to remove your catch statement completely as you are 
just re-throwing the exception anyways and could be suppressing the source.

http://blogs.msdn.com/jmstall/archive/2007/02/07/catch-rethrow.aspx

Michael


-----Original Message-----
From: Marcelino Ponty [mailto:marcelino_po...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thu 11/26/2009 12:51 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ask] index out of range exceptions.
 
Hi Michael!

Thanks for your fast response!

In the stack trace:
at Lucene.Net.Index.DocumentsWriter.Abort(AbortException ae) at 
Lucene.Net.Index.DocumentsWriter.UpdateDocument(Document doc, Analyzer 
analyzer, Term delTerm) at 
Lucene.Net.Index.DocumentsWriter.AddDocument(Document doc, Analyzer analyzer) 
at Lucene.Net.Index.IndexWriter.AddDocument(Document doc, Analyzer analyzer) at 
Lucene.Net.Index.IndexWriter.AddDocument(Document doc) at 
Atmalib.Lucene.Indexing.ExecuteIndexing(Directory dir) in C:\Documents and 
Settings\Administrator\My Documents\Visual Studio 
2005\Projects\CreateIndex\CreateIndex\App_Code\Indexing.cs:line 95

I use Lucene.NET version 2.3.1.2. 

And my program is absolutely simple: 

//main program
        protected static void ExecuteIndexing(Directory dir)
        {
        IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(dir, new StandardAnalyzer(), true);
            try
            {
                string query = "select top 40000 * from v_simple_artikel";
//use public class method to query database
                SqlDataReader row = 
Atmalib.DataAccess.GetDataReaderFromQuery(query); 

//read query results and add document
                while (row.Read())
                {
                   Document doc = new Document();
               doc.Add(new Field("kode_koleksi", 
row["kode_koleksi"].ToString(), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NO, 
Field.TermVector.NO));
               doc.Add(new Field("kode_artikel", 
row["kode_artikel"].ToString(), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NO, 
Field.TermVector.NO));

//....
//adding many other fields
//...

Field.Index.TOKENIZED, Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS));
               doc.Add(new Field("kata_kunci_jurnal", 
row["kata_kunci_jurnal"].ToString(), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED, 
Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS));
                   writer.AddDocument(doc);
                }
                writer.Optimize();
            }
            catch (Exception exp)
            {
                throw exp;
            }

            finally
            {
                writer.Close();
            }
        }
//end of main program

I'll be very grateful if you can give me assistance. Thank you!!



________________________________
From: Michael Garski <mgar...@myspace-inc.com>
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 2:51:19 AM
Subject: Re: [ask] index out of range exceptions.

Hi Marcelino,

Can you provide tha stack trace from the exception and a code 
snippet/description of what you are doing when it is thrown along with the 
version of Lucene.net you are using?

Michael

On Nov 26, 2009, at 11:48 AM, "Marcelino Ponty" <marcelino_po...@yahoo.com> 
wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> I'm a new user of Lucene.NET, but I have experience once in using Ferret 
> which is written in Ruby language. I've come to a problem and hope any of you 
> can help me.
> 
> I'm going to index 50,000 doc, but it failed and give
> 
> System.IndexOutOfRangeExceptions: Index was outside the bound of the array.
> 
> I test with 30,000 doc and it succeed. I think this has something to do with 
> basic predefined parameters while setting up the indexing process which I 
> should have set, but I don't know which parameter it is and where should I 
> set it. Do you guys have any idea? I think the answer should be simple. In 
> Ferret, I didn't meet this problem.
> 
> Thanks for any assistance!
> Regards,
> Marcelino Ponty
> (Phone +62819 - 3223 54 84)
> "Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam"
> 
> 


      

 

Reply via email to