Hi,

i've got the same problem. i has forgotten to store the field value for the date
field (only indexing is not enough!)

manfred

Jan Stövesand wrote:

> Hi,
>
> it is no typo. I thought that a DateFilter will return everything between
> "from" (0) and "to" (2008269714990), specified in the parameter list.
>
> Jan
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
> > Auftrag von Ian Lea
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Dezember 2001 12:40
> > An: Lucene Users List
> > Betreff: Re: Can't get a DateFilter to work
> >
> >
> > Could be just a typo in the email message, but 1008269714990 !=
> > 2008269714990.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ian.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Jan Stövesand wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I really tried everything to get a DateFilter to work but I failed. :-(
> > >
> > > What I did was:
> > >
> > > Indexing:
> > >
> > > doc.add( Field.Keyword("last-modifed",
> > > DateField.timeToString( timeInMillies ) );
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > > millies: 1008269714990
> > > field value: 0cv6xr772
> > >
> > > If i submit a "normal" query, looking for 0cv6xr772 I find the
> > entry, i.e.
> > > the entry should be indexed correctly.
> > > If I search for a text in the body of the element I find about
> > 30 entries
> > > including the one mentioned above with last-midified=0cv6xr772.
> > >
> > > If I repeat the same query with
> > >
> > > DateFilter filter=new DateFilter("last-modified", 0, 2008269714990);
> > > Hits hits = searcher.search(query, filter);
> > >
> > > I do not get any results. What am I doing wrong?
> > > Any help appreciated.
> > >
> > > JAn
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to