On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 10:33 PM, Dmitry Serebrennikov wrote: > I think so... I guess you have many kinds of documents that have some > fields in common and some unique?
Yes. I'm using Lucene as a backbone for a kind of oodbms. Therefore you can index any type of object that may greatly vary in their complexity. > Nope, just the files for the new segment. Well, I think the segments > and deleted files might have "segments.new" and "deleted.new" while > they are being modified, with the old ones removed and new ones renamed > afterwards. Good. > It will optimize more often and, since optimization replaces all > segments with one, the number of files will drop. However, the old > files will stay around until they are no longer in use by pre-existing > IndexReader instances, so that may be another catch. Ok, seems to be consistent with what I'm seeing. Thanks for your explanation. PA. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
