Would it be cheeky to ask you to post the docs to the group? It would be interesting to read how you've tackled this.
-----Original Message----- From: Nader Henein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 13:57 To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Moving from a single server to a cluster Hey Ben, We've been using a distributed environment with three servers and three separate indecies for the past 2 years since the first stable Lucene release and it has been great, recently and for the past two months I've been working on a redesign for our Lucene App and I've shared my findings and plans with Otis, Doug and Erik, they pointed out a few faults in my logic which you will probably come across soon enough that mainly have to do with keeping you updates atomic (not too hard) and your deletes atomic (a little more tricky), give me a few days and I'll send you both the early document and the newer version that deals squarely with Lucene in a distributed environment with high volume index. Regards. Nader Henein Ben Sinclair wrote: >My application currently uses Lucene with an index living on the >filesystem, and it works fine. I'm moving to a clustered environment >soon and need to figure out how to keep my indexes together. Since the >index is on the filesystem, each machine in the cluster will end up >with a different index. > >I looked into JDBC Directory, but it's not tested under Oracle and >doesn't seem like a very mature project. > >What are other people doing to solve this problem? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
