On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 15:48, Erik Hatcher wrote: > This last query has a required clause, which is what BooleanQuery > requires when there is a NOT clause. You're getting what you want here > because you've got an item_type:xyz clause as required. In your first > example, you're requiring field_name:foo, whereas in this one it is not > mandatory.
So, essentially, my query: +item_type:xyz +(field_name:foo -field_name:bar) Gets translated to: +item_type:xyz +field_name:foo -field_name:bar Whereas the more lenient one does not require field_name:foo and returns what I expect. Is that right? Now, to decide whether to try to make this work the way I thought it would, or just document that it doesn't. ;) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
