> why reindex?
Well, since I had different experiences with different analyzers I've tried, I
thougt that this
problem must origin from either the indexing or a lucene bug.
> As stated at the end of my mail, I'd expect that to skip the
> first term in the enum.
Yes, this must be a problem for me, since I took this sentence from the manual
as the starting
point:
"Returns the current Term in the enumeration. Initially invalid, valid after
next() called for the
first time."
So, it seems that it was a bug in the docs, not the api itself.
> Is that, what you miss or do you loose
> more than one term?
It seemed to me that it was skipping more stuff, but I'd better not say this,
since I didn't know
that the term is valid even before the first next(), so I could've been
misleaded by my own
chaotic experiences.
Since my code was completly restructured since then, I don't have all the
surrounging stuff needed
for further testing.
Anyway, we've found a docs bug thanks to you and my code is cleaner and better
the other way.
Thanx!
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
