Re: StandardAnalyzer unit tests?

[Erik Hatcher]

I personally don't have a problem with that change, however I don't 
like changing such things as they can lead to unexpected and confusing 
issues later.  Suppose someone upgrades their version of Lucene without 
re-indexing and now queries that used to work no longer work?  (sure, I 
agree it is wise to re-index if you upgrade Lucene).

Perhaps others could chime in on whether this change would adversely 
affect them or if this a desirable change?

        Erik

On Jan 17, 2005, at 4:51 AM, Chris Lamprecht wrote:
Erik, Paul, Daniel,
I submitted a testcase --
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33134
On a related note, what do you all think about updating the
StandardAnalyzer grammar to treat "C#" and "C++" as tokens?  It's a
small modification to the grammar -- NutchAnalysis.jj has it.
-Chris
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:23:41 -0500, Erik Hatcher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see any tests of StandardAnalyzer either.  Your contribution
would be most welcome.  There are tests that use StandardAnalyzer, but
not to test it directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]