On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:12:54 -0800, Chris Fraschetti wrote: > Definitely a good idea on the one line idea... that could possibly > save a good amount of time. I'm using .stringValue ... in reality, > I hadn't ever even considered readerValue ... is there a strong > performance difference between the two? or is it simply on the > functionality side?
Not that I'm aware of (performance). Reader fields are useful when reading in bulky data which doesn't make sense to be loaded into mem as a String. K --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
