Marvin Humphrey wrote on 12/2/10 6:00 PM: > Instead, I think we should advance the minor version whenever it's > appropriate, and just spin off stable forks whenever it makes sense. Here's > how things might play out: > > Lucy 0.1.0 > Lucy 0.1.1 > Lucy 0.2.0 > Lucy 0.2.1 > Lucy 0.2.2 > Lucy1 1.0.0 > Lucy 0.3.0 > Lucy 0.4.0 > Lucy 0.4.1 > Lucy2 2.0.0 > Lucy 0.5.0 > Lucy 0.6.0 > ... > Lucy 0.10.0 > Lucy 0.11.0 > Lucy 0.11.1 > Lucy3 3.0.0 > Lucy 0.12.0 > ... > > While there's no urgency until we get to our second release, I thought it was > worthwhile to explore this issue prior to adopting X.Y.Z version numbers. >
+! that seems saner, to go the asynchronous route. anyone who cares about only using an API-stable fork won't care what version maps to trunk. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
