Chris Hostetter wrote on 12/7/10 8:29 PM: > 1) Although the lucene release haven't really set a good example of this, > the mantra Juka has always evangalized that i've come to appreciate is > that the "source" release should essentially be "svn export | tar | gzip" >
+1 > 2) The source release is all that matters, it's the only thing that *must* > be voted on. > in that light, I think this thread is moot. Am I wrong? > > i wouldn't jump through any hoops trying to organize the code in some > convoluted way just for the sake of trying to simplify the release voting > -- if you want to to keep the vote simple, make the source release > artificats clean, clear, well documented and easy to "build" > > If it makes sense for the Lucy build to have 200 different binary > artifacts targeted at diff languages, so be it - the important thing is > that every one of those binary packages needs to be reproducable by anyone > with the source release, the build documentation, and a copy of the > neccessary dependencies. > +1 -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
