Nathan Kurz wrote on 04/04/2011 02:44 PM: > Back to pragmatism: if the goal is to get 0.1.0 out the door, stop > worrying about naming stuff and release it. But if the goal is to > provide a better foundation strip out TF/IDF and then put it back in a > sane manner.
I think the goal is a 0.1.0 release. Don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. If the current class naming for Match/Compiler/Query is poor, but functioning, let's kick it down the road in favor of a re-design, as Nate suggests. Backwards-compat-forever is not our friend in this regard. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
