On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > For the core TF/IDF scoring model, yes, I fully agree. > > But Nate would like to use Lucy with an alternative matching engine. He needs > the freedom to implement his own query optimization mechanisms. If Lucy > performs all query optimization "behind the scenes" and that behavior can't be > overridden, it's a problem.
Oh, okay. Less a user than a developer need, I guess. David
