On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: > The apreq harness isn't a good replacement candidate in its present > form, though, because it requires APR.
I tend to like the approach of having everything self-contained, but if there were candidates I would think the the APR would be high on the list. Also, I would guess that a developer only test-suite wouldn't be much of a hindrance to adoption. Is there a formal policy on avoiding outside dependencies, or is this just a general preference? Are you planning to stay the course of independence, or is there a point you'd consider utilizing outside libraries? --nate
